Preparação individualizada de Medicação – avaliação de necessidades e custos de implementação
PDF (Português (Portugal))

Keywords

Dispensa de Medicamentos em Dose Unitária
Avaliação Económica
Serviços Farmacêuticos
Custos em Saúde
Adesão à Terapêutica

How to Cite

Reis, A., Jesus, A., Alves , S., & Calvo , M. L. M. (2026). Preparação individualizada de Medicação – avaliação de necessidades e custos de implementação . Proceedings of Research and Practice in Allied and Environmental Health, 4(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v4i3.7162

Abstract

Background: Individualized Medication Preparation (IMP) systems organize therapy by dose and by day and aim to improve adherence and simplify complex regimens, especially in polymedicated patients [1]. Adherence can have a greater impact on public health than many recent innovations, with non-adherence being one of the main causes of avoidable expenses [2–5].
Objectives: To assess public perceptions of IMP, identify factors associated with willingness to pay (WTP), and estimate the implementation and operation costs of an IMP system in a community pharmacy.

Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study using a structured online questionnaire (n=263; 261 valid responses). Simple binary logistic regression was applied to analyze associations between WTP and sociodemographic and behavioral variables. An economic analysis with fixed and variable costs (2024/2025 euros) was also performed, considering 238 annual preparation days.
Results: The majority of participants were female (75.5%), aged between 19 and 83 years. Although 84% reported no difficulties taking the medication, 59% did not consider the PIM useful for them; only 6% considered it of little use to family members or acquaintances. Overall, 76% expressed PPD and 67% would agree to pay up to €10/month. Female gender showed a lower probability of PPD (-43%), while identifying as a relative (+126%) and recognizing usefulness for others (+190%) increased this probability. The total cost in the first year was €70,171.68 (R$ 9,120.00 initial investment; €21,579.00 in supplies; €39,472.68 in human resources). The daily cost was €233.91, with labor being the main component. Sustainability is estimated with approximately 700 users at €10/month.
Conclusions: The PIM is perceived as beneficial, especially for third parties. Gender, respondent, and perceived usefulness influence the DPP. Despite the significant initial investment, the service can become financially viable through appropriate reimbursement models.

https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v4i3.7162
PDF (Português (Portugal))

References

1. Šola KF, Mucalo I, Brajković A, Jukić I, Verbanac D, Vladimir Knežević S. Drug therapy problems identified among older adults placed in a nursing home: the Croatian experience. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020 Jun 1;48(6). doi:10.1177/0300060520928791 PubMed PMID: 32493090.

2. Aitken M. The $200 Billion Opportunity from Using Medicines More Responsibly Find out more Find out more [Internet]. 2013. Report. Available from: www.theimsinstitute.org

3. Pereira Guerreiro M, Cantrill JA, Pisco L, Martins AP. Considerations on preventable drug-related morbidity in Primary Care Part II-Strategies to reduce the risk of preventable drug-related morbidity. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2005. Report.

4. Glass B, Haywood A, Llewelyn V, Mangan M. Compliance Aids and Medicine Stability: New Evidence of Quality Assurance. Curr Drug Saf. 2009 Feb 1;4:74–8. doi:10.2174/157488609787354459

5. Nair K V., Belletti DA, Doyle JJ, Allen RR, McQueen RB, Saseen JJ, et al. Understanding barriers to medication adherence in the hypertensive population by evaluating responses to a telephone survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:195–206. doi:10.2147/PPA.S18481

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ana Reis