Adverse reactions mediated by radiopharmaceuticals for palliative treatment of bone metastases: a systematic review of literature

Autores

  • Sara Martins Serviços Farmacêuticos, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-3577
  • Cláudia A. Pinho Serviços Farmacêuticos, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal
  • Ângelo Jesus Centro de Investigação em Saúde e Ambiente, Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-8253
  • Ana Martín Suárez Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, España. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-0465

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v1i1.5147

Palavras-chave:

adverse reactions, bone metastases, pharmacovigilance, pain palliation, radiopharmaceuticals

Resumo

Background: Bone metastases are one of the most frequent complications of advanced cancers and one of the therapies used for the palliative treatment of pain associated with them is radiopharmaceutical therapy. Like any other drug, radiopharmaceuticals can cause adverse reactions (AR). Therefore, a global and up-to-date view of AR related to radiopharmaceuticals is essential, to allow the detection, understanding and management of them by health professionals and the patient. Objective: Review the results and conclusions of studies on the use of RF in the palliative treatment of pain associated with bone metastases, particularly, Strontium-89 (89Sr), Samarium-153 (153Sm), Rhenium-186 (186Re) and Rhenium-188 (188Re). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted according to PRISMA statement, using the databases MEDLINE and EBSCO. After the selection process, 20 articles were included. Results: The main AR reported are flare responses and hematologic toxicity. All the studies recovered show that these drugs can provide safe, symptomatic relief from painful osseous metastases and, in most cases, the hematological toxicity was reversible, even in elderly and severely ill patients. There is also evidence of secondary outputs for health and quality of life. Conclusions: Pain is among the most common and distressing symptoms encountered by patients with advanced cancer. The challenge of pain palliation is to achieve effective relief with minimal AR. The studies analyzed presented very similar results regarding pain relief after treatment, decrease in analgesic consumption, AR at the time of administration, hematologic toxicity and disease progression after treatment. The use of RF for pain palliation seems to be safe and an alternative to existing treatments, however more studies are need no access safety and toxicity. Pharmacovigilance of radiopharmaceuticsl is imperative so we can safely study the possible adverse effects of such drugs.

Referências

World Health Organization. Programme for International Drug Monitoring. WHO: n.d. [2023 Apr 01]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/regulation-prequalification/regulation-and-safety/pharmacovigilance/health-professionals-info/pidm

Laroche ML, Quelven I, Mazère J, Merle L. Adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in France: analysis of the national pharmacovigilance database. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2015;49(1):39–47.

Shinto AS, Malia MB, Kameswaran M, et al. Clinical utility of 188Rhenium-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonate as a bone pain palliative in multiple malignancies. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2018;17(4):228-235.

Beiki D, Tajik M, Haddad P, et al. Effectiveness and complications of 188 Re-HEDP in palliative treatment of diffuse skeletal metastases. Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2015;23(1):44-48

Liepe K, Kotzerke J. A comparative study of 188Re-HEDP, 186Re-HEDP, 153Sm-EDTMP and 89Sr in the treatment of painful skeletal metastases. Nuclear Medicine Communications.2007;28(8):623-630.

Cheng A, Chen S, Zhang Y, Yin D, Dong M. The Tolerance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Rhenium-188 Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonate in Advanced Cancer Patients with Painful Osseous Metastases. Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals. 2011;26(2):237-244.

Downloads

Publicado

09-07-2023

Como Citar

Martins, S., Pinho, C. A., Jesus, Ângelo, & Suárez, A. M. (2023). Adverse reactions mediated by radiopharmaceuticals for palliative treatment of bone metastases: a systematic review of literature. Proceedings of Research and Practice in Allied and Environmental Health, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v1i1.5147

Artigos mais lidos do(s) mesmo(s) autor(es)

Artigos Similares

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.