EFFECTS OF DIGITAL ANNOTATIONS IN THE PRODUCTION OF SUMMARIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34630/polissema.vi21.4213

Keywords:

Tecnologia. Escrita. Leitura. Letramento Digital.

Abstract

This work refers to a practical study of reading argumentative text mediated by a digital annotation tool, the DLNotes2, aiming a subsequent production of a text of the genre summary. Our goal was to verify if annotations made on DLNotes2 are recovered by the student in their text production, possibly indicating an aid to their writing production planning. To carry out the study we conducted an activity with students of the first period of the course of Letters of Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (Brazil), held via Google Forms and DLNotes2. In this tool, we asked participants to annotate theory, arguments and counterarguments listed by the author of an opinion article and any other aspects they judged important to their comprehension of it. On a second activity the students produced a summary of the article. We identified if the annotations helped and in fact are present on the student’s summaries, corroborating to our hypothesis that DLNotes2 can be used as a form of support on writing planning. It permeated our work a reflection on New Literacy Studies and the digital literacy.

References

Barbeiro, L. F., & Pereira, L. A. (2007). O ensino da escrita: a dimensão textual. Ministério da Educação. Direcção-geral de Inovação e de Desenvolvimento Curricular.

Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (2008). O professor pesquisador: introdução à pesquisa quantitativa. Parábola.

Correia, R., Mamede, N., Baptista, J., & Eskenazi, M. (2014). Using the crowd to annotate metadiscursive acts. Proceedings 10th Joint ISO-ACL SIGSEM, pp. 102-108.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.

Fayol, M. (2014). Aquisição da Escrita. Parábola Editorial.

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. Longman.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Education.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Pearson Education Limited.

Kleiman, A. (1995). Texto e leitor: aspectos cognitivos da leitura. Pontes.

Machado, A. R., Lousada, E., & Abreu-Tardelli, L. (2017). Resumo. Parábola.

Marshall, C. C. (1997). Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. DL '97 Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries. Philadelphia, USA, pp.23-26.

Miller, C. R. (2012). Gênero textual, agência e tecnologia: estudos. Parábola.

Mittmann, A., Willrich, R., & Fileto, R. (2013). DLNotes2: Anotações Digitais como Apoio ao Ensino. II Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, Campinas, pp. 527 -536.

Mittmann, A., Willrich, R., & Fileto, R. (2013). DLNotes2: Ferramenta de anotações estruturadas e semânticas voltada ao ensino da literatura. Escritorios electrónicos para las literaturas: nuevas herramientas digitales para la anotación colaborativa. Ed. L. P. Núñez. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 137-152.

Mittmann, A., Wangenheim, A., & Santos, A. (2016). A System for the Automatic Scansion of Poetry Written in Portuguese. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 17th International Conference, CICLing 2016, Konya, Turkey, pp. 611-628.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in Applied Psycolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (1998). Other floors, other voices: a textography of a small university building. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Sippel, J. (2021). EFFECTS OF DIGITAL ANNOTATIONS IN THE PRODUCTION OF SUMMARIES. POLISSEMA – ISCAP Journal of Letters, 1(21), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.34630/polissema.vi21.4213

Issue

Section

Research Articles