Lisdexamfetamine: an over(re)view

Authors

  • Mariana Silva Carvalho UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
  • Diana Dias da Silva
  • Daniel José Barbosa
  • Ricardo Dinis-Oliveira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v3i2.6150

Keywords:

lisdexamfetamine, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, ADHD treatment, forensic toxicology

Abstract

Background: Lisdexamfetamine (LDX), a prodrug of d-amphetamine, is a pharmaceutical used in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (1). Objective: Herein we aimed to comprehensively review LDX pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and forensic implications. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed without a limitation period using the keywords LDX, pharmacokinetics/dynamics, clinical use and efficiency, among others related. All types of articles were included. Results: LDX undergoes rapid absorption via peptide transporter 1 (PepT1) in the small intestine, achieving Cmax within 1–2h (2-5), and is hydrolyzed in erythrocytes by an unidentified aminopeptidase, into d-amphetamine and l-lysine (5, 6). Excretion occurs primarily via urine (96.4%), with minimal fecal elimination (0.3%) (2). Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that LDX does not significantly alter the activity of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 (7), suggesting low potential for drug-drug interactions. Its stimulant activity results from trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) activation, monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition, and reverse transport of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), dopamine transporter (DAT), norepinephrine transporter (NAT), and serotonin transporter (SERT), increasing dopamine levels in synaptic cleft (1, 8). Common adverse effects of LDX include dizziness, somnolence, appetite suppression, headache, nausea, and fatigue (9). Concerns regarding growth suppression arise mainly in the first year of treatment and diminishing thereafter (9, 10). Although LDX exhibits a lower reinforcing potential than d-amphetamine (11), supra-therapeutic doses may induce similar abuse liability and toxicity. However, its higher lethal dose threshold (five times that of amphetamines) reduces overdose risk (12). Conclusions: LDX therapeutic efficacy in ADHD is well-established, with superior outcomes relative to other stimulant medications. In forensic context, differentiating between therapeutic and illicit consumption remains a critical challenge. Given its potential applications beyond ADHD, further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate the full scope of LDX’s pharmacological and clinical utility.

References

1. Quintero J, Gutierrez-Casares JR, Alamo C. Molecular Characterisation of the Mechanism of Action of Stimulant Drugs Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate on ADHD Neurobiology: A Review. Neurol Ther. 2022;11(4):1489-517.

2. Krishnan SM, Pennick M, Stark JG. Metabolism, distribution and elimination of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: open-label, single-centre, phase I study in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(12):745-55.

3. Krishnan SM, Stark JG. Multiple daily-dose pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy adult volunteers. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):33-40.

4. Boellner SW, Stark JG, Krishnan S, Zhang Y. Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2010;32(2):252-64.

5. Pennick M. Absorption of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its enzymatic conversion to d-amphetamine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:317-27.

6. Sharman J, Pennick M. Lisdexamfetamine prodrug activation by peptidase-mediated hydrolysis in the cytosol of red blood cells. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:2275-80.

7. Ermer J, Corcoran M, Martin P. Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Effects on the Pharmacokinetics of Cytochrome P450 Substrates in Healthy Adults in an Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study. Drugs R D. 2015;15(2):175-85.

8. Hutson PH, Pennick M, Secker R. Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacology and toxicology of lisdexamfetamine: a novel d-amphetamine pro-drug. Neuropharmacology. 2014;87:41-50.

9. Coghill DR, Caballero B, Sorooshian S, Civil R. A systematic review of the safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(6):497-511.

10. Swanson JM, Elliott GR, Greenhill LL, Wigal T, Arnold LE, Vitiello B, et al. Effects of stimulant medication on growth rates across 3 years in the MTA follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(8):1015-27.

11. Ermer JC, Dennis K, Haffey MB, Doll WJ, Sandefer EP, Buckwalter M, et al. Intranasal versus oral administration of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover, single-dose, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult men. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(6):357-70.

12. Krishnan S, Moncrief S. An evaluation of the cytochrome p450 inhibition potential of lisdexamfetamine in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35(1):180-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Silva Carvalho, M., Dias da Silva, D., José Barbosa, D., & Dinis-Oliveira, R. (2026). Lisdexamfetamine: an over(re)view . Proceedings of Research and Practice in Allied and Environmental Health, 3(2), 43–44. https://doi.org/10.26537/prpaeh.v3i2.6150

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.