A Influência da Língua na Perceção e Resolução de Questões Ambientais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi14.7417Palavras-chave:
Visão de Mundo Linguística, Provérbios, Ditos, Conceito, Linguística Cognitiva, Ambiente NaturalResumo
O estudo analisou como os estereótipos culturais relativos à natureza e ao ambiente moldam a função ecológica da linguagem e influenciam o discurso ambiental em diferentes culturas. Através de uma análise comparativa, foram identificados os principais estereótipos e o seu impacto nos padrões de comportamento ecológico nas sociedades quirguizes, cazaques e de língua inglesa. Observou-se que os provérbios e ditados relacionados com a dominância fomentavam uma sensação de controlo sobre a natureza e reduziam a responsabilidade pela utilização dos recursos, enquanto as parémias que refletiam a perceção da infinitude dos recursos conduziam a uma exploração descuidada. As noções antropocêntricas destacavam a capacidade humana de alterar o ambiente. De forma positiva, a harmonia entre os seres humanos e a natureza era enfatizada, promovendo o respeito pelo ambiente. Os avisos incorporados no folclore destacavam as consequências de um comportamento irresponsável. Os provérbios e ditados que sublinhavam a dependência dos recursos naturais contribuíam para a consciencialização da necessidade de uma utilização racional dos recursos. Enquanto os parémios quirguizes e cazaques transmitiam uma profunda ligação cultural e harmonia mútua com a natureza, os provérbios ingleses reflectiam mais frequentemente uma visão do mundo na qual a acção humana é central, enquadrando muitas vezes a interdependência com a natureza através de uma lente de controlo e valor utilitário.
Referências
Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. (2022). The psychology of communication: The interplay between language and culture through time. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(7-8), 860-874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221114046
Asykova, Z. (2013). Kazakh proverbs. Almaty: “Balausa” Publishing House. https://adebiportal.kz/upload/iblock/994/9949ae5a98f991b547214e6a25bb70a9.pdf
Bang, J.C., & Wilhelm, T. (2014). Aspects of an ecological theory of language. Language Sciences, 41, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.009
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., Skirgaard, H., Ritchie, A., Cardillo, M., Meakins, F., Greenhill, S., & Hua, X. (2022). Global predictors of language threat and the future of linguistic diversity. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 6(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01604-y
Brown, K. (2022). Linguistic ecology and multilingual education. Estonian Journal of ,Educational Sciences, 10(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2022.10.2.02b
Chun-ling, Z. (2021). An ecological cognitive analysis of Chinese harmonious discourse. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713809
Erdem-Mobius, H., Odag, O., & Anders, Y. (2022). The interplay of ethnocultural identity and language: Perceptions and experiences of Turkish immigrant mothers in home-school-society relational spaces. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 24(2), 333-347.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2106230
Fish, R.D., Austen, G.E., Bentley, J.W., Dallimer, M., Fisher, J.C., & Irvine, K.N. (2024). Language matters for biodiversity. BioScience, 74(5), 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae014
Gul, R., Hussain, S., & Ali, S. (2021). An ecolinguistic analysis of metafunctions of language in Pakistani COVID-19 advertorials. Global Language Review, 6(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-I).10
Ha, C. (2023). The year’s work in ecolinguistics 2022. Journal of World Languages, 9(2), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0001
Harrison, K.D. (2023). Environmental linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-013152
Inoue, T. (2023). Toward an ecological model of language: From cognitive linguistics to ecological semantics. Language Sciences, 100, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101582
Koichumanov, J. (2012). Proverbs, sayings, proverbs, wise sayings. Bishkek: Biyiiktik Plus.http://kitepkana.kg/%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D3%A9%D0%B7/%D0%B6%D1%8B%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BA/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BF.html
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2024). Language choice and academic publishing: A socialecological perspective on languages other than English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 2977-2991. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2080834
Maddieson, Ia., & Benedict, K. (2023). Demonstrating the influence of environment on the sound structure of languages: Problems and solutions. Frontiers Psychology, 14, 1200463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200463
Naimanova, C., & Aalieva, K. (2022). Interpretation of the concept of home in the Kyrgyzspeaking worldview: An associative experiment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (pp. 1-7). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220306.001
Nnabueze, N.K., & Zakirova, Y. (2020). On the role of linguistics in ecosystem management. SHS Web of Conferences, 88, 01029. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208801029
Ouadhiri, I.E., Gomez, M., Paylex, J., & Pijourlet, G. (2023). Exploring the role of language in shaping corporate environmental practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137488
Ray, J. (1813). A complete collection of English proverbs: Also, the most celebrated proverbs of the Scotch, Italian, French, Spanish, and other languages. London: G. Cowie and Company. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=q-IyAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover
Sajjad, H., Durrani, N., Dalvi, F., Alam, F., Khan, A., & Xu, J. (2022). Encoded concept analysis in transformer language models. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 3082-3101). Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.225
Samatov, K. (2021). Cognitive linguistics in Kyrgyzstan. Journal “Herald of Kyrgyz Russian Slavic University”, 21(2), 112-125. http://vestnik.krsu.edu.kg/en/archive/162/6840
Singh, L., Barr, R., Quinn, P.C., Kalashnikova, M., Rocha-Hidalgo, J., Freda, C., & D’Souza, D. (2024). The impact of environmental diversity on research and learning: The case of bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(11), 2879-2898.https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001562
Sun, X. (2021). Ecological linguistics – A new research perspective on college English teaching. Advances in Vocational and Technical Education, 3(1), 28-31.https://www.clausiuspress.com/article/1908.html
Tan, N., Chang, X., & Ma, T. (2023). Study on production – Living-ecological function accounting and management in China. Land, 12(6), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061163
Tiv, M., O’Regan, E., & Titon, D. (2022). The role of mentalizing ability and ecological linguistic diversity in bilingual adults’ understanding of irony. Memory and Cognition, 51(2), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01349-4
Xiong, Z. (2023). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(4), 454-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.2023600
Zhang, R. (2022). The year’s work in ecolinguistics 2021. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0009
Zhang, W. (2024). Language, culture, and ecology: An exploration of language ecology in pragmatics. English Language Teaching, 15(6), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n6p80
Zheng, H. (2022). Constructing the meaning of environmental discourse from a cognitive linguistics perspective. Open Access Library Journal, 9(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108795
Zhou, H., Luo, X. (2024). Embodied cognitive linguistics: Integrating Marxist perspectives into modern cognitive linguistics theory. Frontiers Psychology, 15, 1475196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475196
Zhou, X.E., Li, C., & Gao, X.A. (2021). Towards a sustainable classroom ecology: Translanguaging in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in a finance course at an international school in Shanghai. Sustainability, 13(19), 10719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910719
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 E- Revista de Estudos Interculturais
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
