As estéticas da austeridade, da crise e da empatia em intersecção numa subversiva narrativa intermedial: Stone Soup (2014), de Cas Willing e Paula Rego
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi13.6401Mots-clés :
arte e literatura (tradicional), intermedialidade, empatia, precaridade, Paula RegoRésumé
O presente artigo analisa de que forma as estéticas (e temáticas) da austeridade, das crises pessoais e colectivas e da empatia se interseccionam na narrativa intermedial Stone Soup (2014) publicada, por Cas Willing e Paula Rego, no período da austeridade na Grã-Bretanha e em Portugal, e como essa obra traduz intersemioticamente e subverte a história tradicional da sopa de pedra, colocando, no centro da acção, uma jovem inicialmente sem qualquer tipo de agência.
Références
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
Allman, E. (1999). Jacobean revenge tragedy and the politics of virtue. Londres: Associated University Press, 1999.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Londres: Verso.
Aragay, M., Delgado-García, C. & Middeke, M. (Eds.). (2021). Affects in 21st-century British Theatre. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arendt, H. (1969). Between past and future. Nova Iorque: Viking Press.
Bal, P. M. & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), s.p. Retirado de: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055341.
Balestrini, N. W., Lippert, L & Löschnigg, M. (2020). Theater of crisis: contemporary aesthetic responses to a cross-sectional condition. Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 8(1), 2–14.
Biressi, A., & Nunn, H. (2014). Selfishness in austerity times. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 56, 54-66.
Blair, R. J. R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4), 698– 718.
Booth, W. C. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Oakland: University of California Press.
Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-First century fiction: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breithaupt, F. (2019). The dark sides of empathy (A. B. B. Hamilton YTrad.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chiaet, J. (2013). Novel finding: Reading literary fiction improves empathy. Scientific American. Retirado de:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/novel-finding-reading-literary-fiction-improves-
empathy.
Claridge, L. & Langland, E. (Eds.). (1990). Out of Bounds: Male writers and gender(ed) criticism. Amherst: U of Massachusetts.
Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social critique. Durham: Duke University Press.
Collins, P. & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Coplan, A. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics
and Art Criticism, 62, 141–152.
Corbett, R. (2016). You must change your life: the story of Rainer Maria Rilke and Auguste Rodin. Nova Iorque: W. W. Norton & Co.
Crisis and Critique Network (s.d.). Crisis and critique network. Leida: Universidade de Leida. Retirado de: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/researchprojects/humanities/crisis-and-critique-network.
Cummings, L. B. (2016). Empathy as dialogue in theatre and performance. Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 1(9), 67–85.
Editors (2011). About us. Kolektivi materializmi dialektik: Crisis and critique. Retirado de:
https://www.crisiscritique.org/about-us.
Elliott, L., Inman, P. & Smith, H. (05-03-2013). IMF admits: We failed to realise the damage austerity would do to Greece. The Guardian. Retirado de:
Eres, R. & Molenberghs, P. (2013). The influence of group membership on the neural correlates involved in empathy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–5.
Erickson, P. (1991). Rewriting Shakespeare, rewriting ourselves. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020). Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 29(2), 124–146.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Gutleben, C. (2015). Serious play: the representation of the thatcher years in Malcolm
Bradbury’s Cuts, David Lodge’s Nice Work and Alan Hollinghusrt’s The Line of Beauty. Études Britanniques Contemporaines, 49, s.p. Retirado de: http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/2705.
Hammond, M. M. & Kim, S. J. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking empathy through literature, Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Harpham, G. G. (1995) Ethics. In F. Lentricchia & T. McLaughlin (Eds.). Critical terms for literary study (pp. 387-405). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hogan, P. C. (2010). Fictions and feelings: On the place of literature in the study of emotion. Emotion Review, 2(2), 184–195.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a Story Increases Empathy, Prosocial Behavior,
and Perceptual Bias toward Fearful Expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150-155.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 3, 435-464.
Keen, S. (2010). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kidera, J. (2023). How reading fiction can make you a better person. Think Big. Retirado de:
https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/reading-fiction-empathy-better-person.
Lamarque, P. & Olsen, Stein H. (1994). Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lanzoni, S. (2018). Empathy: A history, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Levin, J. (2016). Review: Productive dialogues across disciplines: Literature and empathy studies. Journal of Modern Literature, 39(4), 187–193.
Lisboa, M. M. (2017). Paula Rego’s map of memory: National and sexual politics, Londres: Routledge.
Lodge, D. (2002). Consciousness and the novel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mack, M. (2012). How literature changes the way we think. Londres: Continuum.
Mack, M. (2014). Philosophy and literature in times of crisis: Challenging our infatuation with numbers. Londres: Bloomsbury.
Mar, R. A. et al. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712.
McNay, L. (2016). Agency. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 39-60). Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: why democracy needs humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
O’Hara, M. (2020). The shame game: Overturning the toxic poverty narrative. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Patterson, C. (21-09-2014). Paula Rego: My beautiful dark twisted fantasies. The Sunday Times. Retirado de:
http://www.andrejordangroup.pt/assets/paula-rego,-sunday-times,-21-setembro-2014.pdf.
Pedwell, C. C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinto, S. M. B. (2007). O Imaginário infantil na obra de Paula Rego: Narrativas visuais.
Dissertação de mestrado. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.
Público. (29-09-2014). Paula Rego: O último rei de Portugal, Eça e a sopa de pedra. Público. Retirado de: http://www.publico.pt/culturaipsilon/noticia/nova-exposicao-de-paula-rego-emlondres-inspirada-por-eca-de-queiros-1671206.
Rego, P. & Willing, C. (2014). Stone soup. Londres: Enitharmon Editions.
Reynolds, D. & Reason, R. (2012). Kinesthetic empathy in creative and cultural practice. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Ritivoi, A. D. (2016). Reading stories, reading (others’) lives: Empathy, intersubjectivity, and narrative understanding. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 8(1), 51-75.
Segal, E. A. et al. (2017). Assessing empathy. Nova Iorque: Columbia University Press.
Stansfield, J. & Bruce, L. (2014). The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: Separate roles for cognitive and affective components. Journal of European Psychology Students, 5(3), 9-18.
Taylor, M., Hodges, S. & Kohányi, A. (2003). The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own?. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22(4), 361–380.
Thane, P. (2018). Divided: A history of Britain, 1900 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tolstoi, Leo (1904). What is art? (A. Maude, Trad.). Nova Iorque: Funk & Wagnalis Company.
Treloar, R. (2014). Intersectionality. In T. Teo (Ed.). Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 995-1001). Londres: Springer.
Walby, S. (2015). Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Weldon, S. L. (2008). Intersectionality. In G. Goertz & A. G. Mazur (Eds.). Politics, gender, and concepts: Theory and methodology (pp. 193-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Womack, K. (2002). Postwar academic fiction satire, ethics, community. Londres: Palgrave.
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: theory of mind and the novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© E- Journal d'études interculturelles 2025
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
