Designing a First Ever PhD Program on a Polytechnic HE Business School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi13.6317Keywords:
Curriculum Design, Intercultural, Interdisciplinary, Inovation, 3rd CycleAbstract
This paper describes a complex challenge in pedagogical innovation within higher education, specifically the curriculum design of a new PhD program in Intercultural Studies for Innovation, taught in English, in a business school of the Portuguese polytechnic subsystem. The research undertaken for the creation of the program encompassed the identification, evaluation, and implementation of cutting-edge pedagogical strategies and mixed-methods, combining qualitative analysis of curriculum design processes, learning assessment and expected outcomes.
As globalization continues to reshape the academic landscape, the demand for professionals wellversed in intercultural competencies has intensified, especially within business companies. This study delves into the strategic integration of innovative pedagogical approaches to cultivate a learning environment that not only addresses the unique challenges of intercultural studies but also fosters critical thinking, collaboration, and adaptability with an actual impact in business and society.
Methodologically, the research that sustains the design of the PhD program involves extensive literature reviews, consultations with experts in intercultural studies, and iterative feedback loops with stakeholders, including business companies and associations, city councils, cultural foundations, partner overseas universities, and potential doctoral candidates. The integration of diverse pedagogical models – including tutorials, seminars, mentorships, case studies, practical application of knowledge in real settings, problem-based learning, and project-based learning, as well as immersion in business, institutional and R&D environments – under an interdisciplinary framework, is systematically explored.
References
Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2018). Research writing: Breaking the barriers. Springer.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). Co-creation for sustainability. Emerald.
Bannister, P., & Cullen, J. (2022). Tutoring: A guide to learning and teaching practices. Oxford University Press.
Beaufort, A. (2019). Making space for theory in academic writing: Moving from theoretical review to critical framing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 17-28.
Blackmore, P., & Kandiko Howson, C. (Eds.). (2018). Critical perspectives on the doctoral research process. Routledge.
Deserti, A., Real, M., & Schmittinger, F. (2022). Co-creation for Responsible Research and Innovation: Experimenting with Design Methods and Tools. Springer.
Erbguth, J., Schörling, M., Birt, N. et al. (2022) Co-creating innovation for sustainability. Gr Interakt Org 53, 83–97.
Gaver, W. & Boucher, A. & Pennington, S. & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. interactions. 11. 53-56. 10.1145/1015530.1015555.
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2020). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Green, D. (2018). From theory to practice: Teaching for transfer of learning in doctoral education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(1), 5.
Grunwald, G. (2022). Sustainability co‐creation in digitalized global value chains. Strategic Change, 31(1), 19-29.
Halas, C.T. (2021). The Dialogue Café as a Participatory Method in Research—Potentials and Challenges. In: Wulf-Andersen, T., Follesø, R., Olsen, T. (eds) Involving Methods in Youth Research. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hmelo, C. (Ed.). (2018). Principles and practices of teaching and training: A guide for teachers and trainers in the FE and skills sector. Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & DeLeeuw, K. E. (2021). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1079-1107.
Lee, A. (2019). The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 271-286.
Mann, S. J. (2018). Developing a theoretical-practical framework for doctoral education. Higher Education, 76(2), 265-283.
O'Grady, S. (2022). The Art of Tutorial Teaching: A Comprehensive Guide for Educators. Cambridge University Press.
Svensson, J. & Ihlstrom Eriksson, C. & Ebbesson, E. (2010). User Contribution in Innovation Processes - Reflections from a Living Lab Perspective, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.424.
Taylor, S., Beasley, N., & Swabey, K. (2019). Scaffolding the doctoral journey: A transformative pedagogical approach to doctoral research education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 639-648.
Topping, K. (2021). Peer tutoring: A practical guide for education professionals. Routledge.
Walker, M., Thomson, P., & Graham, L. (Eds.). (2019). The routledge doctoral supervisor's companion: Supporting effective research in education and the social sciences. Routledge.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2019). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 E-Journal of Intercultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
