Some considerations about the Judicial System of the People's Republic of China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi12.5778Keywords:
Popular Courts, Specialized Courts, Procuratory, Judicial SystemAbstract
The People's Republic of China has become one of the greatest powers in the world in recent years, however, its judicial system is characterized by remaining intact for a long time, with small reforms to adapt to new social and legal situations. The advance of the People's Republic of China as one of the main economic powers has meant that all its institutional and legal machinery has gradually adapted to the new times. That is why we focus this study on the analysis of its structure, its judicial organization, as well as the principles that govern the operation of said system.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the judicial institutions of the People's Republic of China, carrying out a brief study of each of them, their structure, formation and operation. Specifically, we will analyze the judicial structure and, briefly, the existing fiscal institution in that country.
References
Administrative Procedure Law [中华人民共和国行政诉讼法], 1 de noviembre de 2014.
A.H.Y., CHEN. (2004). An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China. (2004). Hong Kong, 2nd ed.
Civil Procedure Law, [中华人民共和国民事诉讼法], 9 de abril de 1991.
Constitution of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国宪法), 14 de marzo de 2004.
Criminal Procedure Law, [中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法], 1 de julio de 1979.
DE BAGGIS, S. (2016). La codificazione del diritto civile cinese, Liber Università Internazionale degli Studi social.
DILIBERTO, O. (2012). “La lunga marcia. Il diritto romano nella Repubblica Popolare Cinese”, en Disegnare il futuro con intelligenza antica. L’insegnamento del latino e del greco antico in Italia e nel mondo (L. Canfora e U. Cardinale cur.), Bologna.
ESPELID, C. (2014). Judicial Independence in China: a Post-totalitarian Story, University of Bergen.
GRIMHEDEN, J., (2004). Themis V. Xiezhi: Assessing Judicial Independence in the People’s Republic of China Under International Human Rights Law, Lund University.
HE, R., (2019). “La traducción de terminología jurídica penal entre el español y el chino desde la perspectiva del derecho comparado”, en Traducción y sostenibilidad cultural, Universidad de Salamanca.
Interpretation on the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Special Maritime Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, [最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国海事诉讼特别程序法》若干问题的解释], Supreme People’s Court, 1 de febrero de 2003.
Judges Law of the People’s Republic of China [中华人民共和国法官法], 28 de febrero de 1995.
LI, Y. (2014). The judicial system and reform in Post-Mao China: Stumbling Towards Justice, Routledge. LIU, N. (1997). Judicial Interpretation in China, Hong Kong-Singapore.
MAZZA, M., (2010). Le istituzioni giudiziarie cinesi – dal diritto imperial all’ordinamento repubblicano e alla Cina popolare, Milano. MUGELLI, C. (2013).“Judicial Independence in China: A comparative perspective”, en Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54, N. 1, Marzo. Organic Law of the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, [中华人民共和国人民法院组织法],National People’s Congress, 1 de julio de 1979.
PEERENBOOM, R. (2010). Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion, Cambridge University Press. Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Scope of Cases to be accepted by Maritime Courts, [最高人民法院关于海事法院受理案件范围的规定] Supreme People’s Court, 28 de diciembre de 2015.
SCHIPANI, S. (2018). “Fundamentos romanísticos y derecho chino”, en Revista de Derecho Privado.
SCHIPANI, S. (2016). “Fondamenti romanistici e diritto cinese (riflessioni su un comune lavoro nell’accrescimento del sistema)”, Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano Vittorio Scialoja, Nº 110, 2017.
SHENG ZHANG. (2002). “Institution and Practice of Independent Adjudication of the Dali Yuan in the Early Republic of China”, Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing. Supreme People’s Court Statement, 30 de julio de 2012.
Supreme People’s Court Judicial Interpretation, 17 julio 2012.
TIMOTEO, M. (2017). “La lunga marcia della codificazione civilenella Cina contemporanea”, todos ellos en Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano Vittorio Scialoja, Nº 110.
TOTI, E., (2020). Diritto Cinese dei contratti e sistema giuridico romanistico. Tra legge e dottrina, Roma.
WANG, Y.; BIDDULPH, S.; GODWIN, A. (2017). A Brief introduction to the Chinese Judicial System and Court Hierarchy, Asian Law Centre.
WENG, B.S.J. (2001). “Judicial Independence under the Basic Law”, en Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law in Hong Kong, TSANG, S. (Ed.), Hong Kong University Press.
XIN, C. (2003). “What kind of judicial power does China need?”, I. CON: International Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 1, N 1, Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law.
ZHANG, L., DONG, N. (2017). “A new Reading on Great Qing Code: A comparative and Historical Survey”, en Historia et ius: Rivista d' istoria giuridica dell’età medieval e moderna, N. 11.
ZHANG, L. (2009). “Los últimos avances en la codificación del Derecho Civil Chino”, en Revista Chilena de derecho, Vol. 36, Nº 3.
ZHANG, L. (2013). “Comparative Law in China”, en New Frontiers of Comparative Law, University of Macau.
ZHANG M.; ZHANG B. (2015). “Specialised Environmental Courts in China: Status Quo, Challenges and Responses”, en Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 E-Journal of Intercultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
