Liangzhi and Conscience: Intercultural Grammars of Moral Knowing between China and the West

Autores

  • Nuno Miranda Universidade Aberta, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi14.7429

Palavras-chave:

Comparative Philosophy, Intercultural Studies, Moral epistemology, liangzhi, Crosscultural dialogue

Resumo

This study explores how moral understanding is shaped by language and culture, using the encounter between the Chinese concept of liangzhi and Western notions of moral conscience as a point of departure. It argues that these frameworks do not merely represent different ethical theories but sustain distinct ways of speaking, reasoning, and feeling about the moral life. The paper proposes that intercultural dialogue should therefore be approached as a process of linguistic clarification rather than conceptual translation. By examining how moral knowledge functions within different “forms of life,” it suggests that the work of intercultural philosophy lies not in reconciling traditions but in learning to communicate across their moral grammars. Such dialogue transforms ethical universality from a single system into a shared yet plural field of meaning.        

Referências

Aquinas, T. (n.d.). Summa theologiae (English translation). Documenta Catholica Omnia

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Batoche Books.

Augustine. (1838). Confessions (E. B. Pusey, Trans.). John Henry Parker; J. G. and F. Rivington.

Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press.

Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford University Press.

Confucius 孔子. (2002). The Analects: New Interpretation 论语新解, edited by Qian Mu. Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlianshudian 生活读书新知三联书店.

Connolly, W. E. (1991). IdentityDifference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox (Expanded ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

de Mul, J. (2011). Horizons of hermeneutics: Intercultural hermeneutics in a globalizing world. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 6(4), 628-655.

Descartes, R. (1998). Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy (Donald A. Cress, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.

Fathi, M. (2024). Moral Education and Self-Actualization in the Thought of Mencius. Religions and Mysticism, 57(1), 67-83.

Fornet-Betancourt, R. (2020). Transformación intercultural de la filosofía. Ediciones digitales Aachen / Barcelona.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum.

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). MIT Press.

Heidegger, M. (1971). On the way to language (P. D. Hertz, Trans.). Harper and Row.

Herman, B. (1985). The Practice of Moral Judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(8), 414– 436.

Hume, D. (1896). A treatise of human nature (L.A. Selby-Bigge, Eds.). Clarendon Press.

Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (Allen W. Wood, Trans.). Yale University Press.

Lee, S.H. (2018). “Confucianism as an Antidote for the Liberal Self‐Centeredness: A Dialogue between Confucianism and Liberalism”. In Confucianisms for a Changing World Cultural Order (Edited by Roger T. Ames and Peter D. Hershock). University of Hawai’i Press, 29-42.

Locke, J. (1963). A letter concerning toleration. Martinus Nijhoff.

Locke, J. (1999). An essay concerning human understanding. Pennsylvania State University.

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue, A Study in Moral Theory (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.

Mengzi 孟子. (1988). Mengzi: Translation and Commentary 孟子譯註. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company 中華書局出版.

Mill, J. S. (2001). On liberty. Batoche Books.

Mou, B. (2022). Comparative Philosophy as a General Way of Doing Philosophy through Cross-Tradition Engagement toward World Philosophy. Comparative Philosophy, 13(2), 5, 4-22

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. Free Press.

Panikkar, R. (1999). The intrareligious dialogue. Paulist Press.

Ping, D., & Israel, G. L. (2020). The Eight Virtues of Liangzhi: An Analysis of the Fundamental Characteristics of Wang Yangming’s Central Doctrine. Journal of World Philosophies, 5(2), 73-93.

Plato. (1997). Complete works (J. M. Cooper, Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.

Rošker, Jana. (2014). "Epistemology in Chinese Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.).

Shweder, R. A. (2003). Why do men barbecue? Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.

Sun, L. 孙隆基 (2015). The deep structure of Chinese culture 中国文化深层的结构. China Citic Press.

Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.

Tu, W. (2013). Confucian humanism in perspective. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China, 7(3), 333-338.

Van Norden, B. W. (1996). What should Western philosophy learn from Chinese philosophy? In P. J. Ivanhoe (Ed.), Chinese language, thought, and culture: Nivison and his critics (pp. 224-249). Open Court.

Wang, Yangming 王陽明. (2014). Wang Yangming: The Complete Works vol. 1 王陽明全集 壹. Beijing: Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe 中國文史出版社.

Weber, M. (1950). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell

Downloads

Publicado

2026-07-15

Como Citar

Miranda, N. (2026). Liangzhi and Conscience: Intercultural Grammars of Moral Knowing between China and the West. E- Revista De Estudos Interculturais , (14). https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi14.7429

Edição

Secção

Artigos